Published on:

Our Miami semi-truck accident attorneys recognize that trucking collisions differ from other motor vehicle accidents.  A big-rig crash is not just a collision involving a large vehicle, a collision involving a vehicle that outweighs the other vehicle by 25 times poses special dangers.  When a semi-truck collides with an automobile, any resulting serious injury almost always involves occupants of the other vehicle.  Because trucking companies anticipate potential liability, they frequently are geared up to dispatch investigators to a crash site within a few minutes.  The trucking industry also is notorious for manipulating evidence.  For example, driver logbooks that are used to track hours of service and maintenance are derisively referred to in the industry as “lie books.”  This practice means that the issue of “spoliation” of evidence often arises in trucking litigation.  While spoliation of evidence often is alleged against the trucking company, this blog examines a court decision in which the victim of an unsafe trucker faces these allegations.

In Cook v. Tarbert Logging, Inc., the plaintiff’s pickup was struck by a semi-truck driven by an employee of a logging company.  Several months after the collision, the plaintiff retained an attorney, as well as an expert to examine the pickup.  The expert’s investigation included taking measurements and photos, but the airbag control monitor was not accessed.  This omission became a serious issue because the airbag control monitor could have revealed speeding by the plaintiff at the moment of impact. Continue reading →

Published on:

Our Miami tractor-trailer accident attorneys recognize that 80-pound fully loaded big-rigs can cause catastrophic injury and horrific carnage.  Although intoxicated drivers pose a serious danger no matter what type of vehicle they drive, the prospect of a drunken truck driver is especially frightening.  In this blog, we consider a case decided by the Florida 2nd Court of Appeals that considered whether to deny recovery to the victim of an alcohol-impaired truck driver because the plaintiff was alleged to have misled the court.

The 2nd DCA in Duarte v. Snap-On, Inc. considered the liability of a trucking company for injuries caused by their intoxicated driver.  Several family members of the driver of the other vehicle, who were passengers in the car of the plaintiff, also were injured, but their cases settled.  The injured car driver was involved in a second collision before the lawsuit involving the first collision proceeded to trial.  The trucking company in the lawsuit arising out of the first accident defended based on the claim the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the subsequent rear-end collision.

During the discovery process, the trucking company asked the plaintiff to provide information about the plaintiff’s involvement in any other motor vehicle accident.  The defendants eventually characterized the plaintiff’s responses as misrepresentations.  The trial judge granted the defendants motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on the grounds the plaintiff provided discovery responses that were dishonest and misleading.  The plaintiff eventually provided details of the second accident and explained he struggled with English and his memory after the initial accident.  The trial judge granted the defendants motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Continue reading →

Published on:

Although the analysis of tractor-trailer accident lawsuits is not new to this blog, this article focuses on a tractor-trailer that was parked at the time of the collision.  The enormous size and weight of semi-trucks create potential dangers even when the vehicles are stationary.  The length and height of a tractor-trailer cause many blind spots for truck drivers, which are referred to as “no zones.”  These vehicles obscure the visibility of other motorists more significantly than a typical passenger car or even a large SUV.  In this blog post, our experienced Miami tractor-trailer accident attorneys examine a Florida Court of Appeals decision involving a collision between a plaintiff and a parked semi-truck.

In Newsome v. LinkAmerica Express, the defendant was the owner and operator of a tractor-trailer.  The truck owner routinely parked his big-rig on the street in front of his home to facilitate frequent use of the vehicle.  On the day of the crash, the plaintiff was traveling on the defendant’s street on the side of the road where the large truck was located.  The plaintiff alleged the sunlight reflecting off the windshield of his vehicle led to him being briefly blinded.  Although the plaintiff slowed his vehicle to cope with the glare, he slammed into the back of the semi-truck because he could not see it in time. Continue reading →

Published on:

While it might be tempting to assume commercial carriers step up and compensate trucking accident victims for their injuries, the truth is far more ominous.  Trucking companies recognize they face a heightened risk of liability because of the permanent life-altering injuries and carnage caused by semi-truck crashes.  When a fatigued driver or poorly maintained semi-truck causes a collision between a big-rig and a passenger car, trucking companies rely on investigators that can be dispatched quickly, experienced insurance defense attorneys, industry experts, and extensive litigation resources.  Trucking accident victims sometimes go uncompensated because they lack legal representation.  In this blog, our experienced Miami tractor-trailer accident lawyers review a federal appellate court decision that involves multiple defense strategies often used in trucking accident lawsuits.

There are situations where a truck driver and trucking company have no basis for disputing liability, so the defense will focus on contesting damages as evidenced in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision of Guzman v. Jones.  The plaintiff was injured when his vehicle was struck by a tractor-trailer driven by one defendant and owned by another defendant (the trucking company).  The trucking company conceded liability based on both negligence and vicarious liability (Florida law permits an employer to be held liable for the negligence of an employee for injuries caused in the course and scope of employment). Continue reading →

Published on:

 

If you are involved in a big-rig collision, the impact on your life of an accident involving a vehicle that weighs 25 times more than a typical passenger car can be catastrophic.  The outcome of a personal injury claim typically determines an accident victim’s ability to obtain compensation for lost income, hospital bills, medical expenses, rehabilitation, pain and suffering, and other damages.  Because some people do not immediately recognize the extent of their injuries, they procrastinate in terms of seeking legal advice and representation.  Because plaintiffs are rarely successful in getting an adverse trial judgment reversed on appeal, time is of the essence in seeking legal representation from an experienced semi-truck accident attorney.

In this blog, our Florida personal injury law firm reviews a trucking accident case demonstrating the deference given to the verdict of a trial court on appeal.  A married couple was driving on a wet road when another driver lost control of his pickup truck, which veered off the roadway into a ditch.  The husband engaged the brakes, but a truck driver operating a tractor-trailer behind the couple was unable to stop.  The couple sued the trucking company and the employee driving the big-rig.  The jury returned a verdict of almost $4 million, and the defendants appealed. Continue reading →

Published on:

While many trucking accidents result from unrealistic shipping schedules, fatigued truck drivers, and poorly maintained big-rigs, improper loads also contribute to a significant number of collisions.  Our Miami trucking accident attorneys recognize that the massive length and weight of a tractor-trailer mean that excessive loads, unbalanced loads, and poorly secured loads often interfere with proper handling and contribute to life-altering tractor-trailer collisions.

Because our Florida semi-truck accident lawyers have extensive experience handling trucking litigation, we can navigate the complexities involved in these sophisticated vehicular lawsuits.  Our law firm has the expertise to navigate the extensive matrix of state and federal trucking regulations, as well as a network of nationally renowned industry experts.  In this blog, we focus on the role of improper loads. Continue reading →

Published on:

The prominence of the Internet and popularity of social network sites have dramatically changed the way people live their lives.  It was not so long ago that privacy was so important to people that the notion of allowing others to monitor every aspect of a person’s life would have been viewed as an unreasonable intrusion of privacy.  Social networks have changed these societal norms.  Many people now live in full view of virtual strangers and provide extensive details about every aspect of their daily activities.  Our Miami trucking accident lawyers know that this choice to live one’s life in full view of anyone who will watch and listen can create a serious problem if you are injured in a tractor-trailer accident.

Insurance companies often hire investigators to help them develop negative information about an injury victim that the insurer could use to their advantage in negotiations or at trial.  These investigators regularly search social network sites for information that can be used when defending a personal injury lawsuit. If you have a social network page on Facebook, Twitter or MySpace, you must be very careful about what you post on your site because it may later become evidence in your personal injury lawsuit.  Some examples of how your social network site can hurt your personal injury case might include: Continue reading →

Published on:

Our trucking accident lawyers acknowledge that the trucking industry serves an indispensable, logistics role that is essential to the U.S. economy.  Despite this important function, these massive vehicles exact a devastating toll when negligent commercial drivers and indifferent trucking companies fail to exercise reasonable care for the safety of other vehicle occupants, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.  Whether a trucking accident occurs because a driver is not adequately trained, screened, or supervised or a trucking company fails to perform appropriate vehicle maintenance, tractor-trailer accident victims face special obstacles when seeking financial compensation.  Trucking companies anticipate the prospect of litigation arising out of collisions involving their drivers and big-rigs, and they are prepared to protect their interests.  Litigation of claims against commercial carriers can be complicated by the practice of spoliation of evidence.

The plaintiff in Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bush filed a personal injury claim seeking compensation for injuries incurred when a truck driver rear-ended the plaintiff’s vehicle.  She suffered both neurological and physical injuries which forced her to struggle with pain through the duration of the case.  The plaintiff prevailed in the trial court, but the commercial driver and the trucking company appealed based on alleged error by the trial judge on the issue of spoliation of evidence, as well as grounds of insufficient evidence to support the verdict. Continue reading →

Published on:

Although vehicle occupants injured in trucking accidents have the right to pursue a lawsuit in Florida without legal representation, the decision to do so will virtually guarantee disastrous results.  Commercial carriers and their insurance companies expect that truck drivers will be involved in accidents, so trucking companies anticipate litigation.  Commercial carriers have rapid response investigation teams, a network of accident reconstruction experts, and extensive litigation resources all focused on denying or limiting the recovery for the injuries and fatalities caused by careless truck drivers and unsafe tractor-trailers.

Along with these reasons for not attempting to handle a trucking accident claim without an experienced Miami trucking accident lawyer, unrepresented plaintiffs also must navigate the rules of civil procedure, local court rules, evidentiary rules, and many other technical and procedural “rules of the game.”  If you do not understand these procedural requirements, you are like a participant in a highly complex game without knowing how the game is played.  In this blog post, our Miami tractor-trailer injury attorneys review a recent case that demonstrates the folly of trying to proceed without legal representation in complex trucking litigation.
Continue reading →

Published on:

Miami tractor-trailer injury attorneys recognize that a “minor trucking accident” is a fiction.  When a collision occurs between vehicles that are 25 times different in weight, the smaller vehicle does not tend to hold up well under the force of the impact.  While tractor-trailer accidents often result in catastrophic injury or wrongful death, the individual who suffers life-altering injury or wrongful death is almost exclusively an occupant of the other vehicle.  In fatal collisions between passenger vehicles and large trucks, the party who dies is an occupant of the passenger vehicle 97 percent of the time.  Given the high stakes in personal safety and loss of life associated with collisions involving large trucks, allegations that a plaintiff’s conduct contributed to his own injuries can have a devastating impact.  In this blog post, our Miami tractor-trailer accident lawyers review a recent court case where a new trial was ordered so that a jury could evaluate the issue of the plaintiff’s fault.

In the 4th DCA decision of Botta v. Florida Power & Light Co., a motorist injured in a collision with a large truck filed suit alleging negligence.  During an after hours power outage, the utility company dispatched a driver operating a large truck to investigate the problem.  Although it was dark outside, the driver of the truck from the utility company did not put out reflective markers when he parked on the side of the road.  The parties disagreed on the question of whether the driver of the truck turned on his hazard blinkers.  The plaintiff slammed into the back of the large truck, but he contended that he thought the vehicle was in motion. While the plaintiff also presented evidence that he attempted to brake to avoid the collision, a witness testified that the plaintiff did not reduce his speed before the accident.  Conflicting evidence also was presented regarding whether the plaintiff had his headlights on at the time of the crash.  The utility company argued that the defendant had poor vision, which contributed to the accident. Continue reading →

Contact Information